|The Old Colonists Banquet 1872,
State Library of South Australia
This began as another of my emigration stories based on the ships my relatives sailed on when they left the Kent Sussex borders in the early 1800s. In the process of checking a detail using Trove, the Australian newspaper website, the story developed a life of its own and shows what a valuable tool newspapers can be - and also that not all emigration stories had a happy ending.
Daniel Tree 1798-1872
Daniel is a man of some mystery with conflicting dates regarding his birth but he was most probably baptised in Northiam, Sussex on 18 November 1798, the son of William and Martha Tree and was therefore the younger brother of Henry Tree my 4 x paternal great grandfather.
In 1817 banns of marriage were called showing that Daniel lived in Canterbury and his future wife Mary Hodges in Bethersden, Kent. Online registers are unclear about where the marriage took place, whether it was Canterbury or Bethersden, but shortly after the wedding on 24 August 1817 their daughter Marian Celia was baptised in Bethersden.
On the South Australian passenger site Daniel is shown as a shoemaker, leaving London on the Resource on 7 October 1838 and arriving in South Australia on 23 January 1839. With him on arrival were three children Adeline, Mary Anne (Marian) Cecilia and Edwin George. His wife Mary and a further child died at sea. A later comment made by Daniel suggest that Mary died following childbirth
|Extract from details below|
Another passenger Thomas James Haddrick, kept a diary of the voyage which has been transcribed and refers to the death at sea of Mrs Tree on Friday 22 November 1838 and of ‘Mr Tree’s child’ on 14th December.
Early days in Adelaide: shoemaker to publican
The widowed Daniel arrived in Adelaide in 1839 aged around 40 with three children 22, 17 and 8 and initially seems to have worked as a shoemaker. By 1845 he was sufficiently established in the community to sign the “Memorial by the Colonists of South Australia Against the Introduction of Convicts”. [a]
In 1846 his daughter Mary Ann married William Lloyd. [b]
The following year Daniel was granted a licence in respect of the “Shoemakers’ Arms” in Adelaide beginning a stream of numerous licensing applications, refusals, grants and appeals over the years and the frequent involvement of “Mr Hanson”.
|South Australian, Dec 17 1847|
|Adelaide Time, Dec 4 1848|
|South Australian, 16 March 1849|
In June 1849 Daniel was granted the licence of the Crown and Sceptre, Gillespie Street, Adelaide where he remained for the next decade. [c]
The 1850s, relationships, the law and a second family
|Adelaide Tmes, 4 May 1851|
|South Australian Gazette & Mining Journal July 24, 1851|
|Adelaide Times, 18 Oct 1851
On 25 November 1851 Daniel then aged around 53 married his second wife Charlotte Manning aged 28. Between 1851 and 1856 they had three sons. Another son was born in 1858 but died shortly after birth along with his mother, a fact which becomes important later on in this story.
Meanwhile Daniel continued to fall foul of the law for various infractions: not clearing his taproom or closing the doors, failing to keep a lamp alight, keeping a fire in the open air etc, but despite this his licence for the Crown and Sceptre was renewed in 1855.
|South Australian Register, 6 March 1855|
|Adelaide Observer, March 24 1855|
Adelaide Times, 13 March 1855
|Adelaide Times 28 March 1855|
|South Australian Register, Friday 17 April 1857|
In 1857 Daniel became embroiled in more controversy surrounding the inquest into the death of a neighbour’s child by scalding, which also involved his opinion on taking the oath.
|South Australian Register, Dec 28 1857|
|Adelaide Times, 30:Dec 1857|
Having been accused of being a bad neighbour Daniel wrote to the newspaper in his defence:
Early in 1859 he was charged with serving alcohol to a drunken woman. Again the case was dismissed [e]
It all starts to go wrong
Daniel’s second wife Charlotte died on 9 March 1858 eight days before the death of her newborn son Frederick. After three months had passed, on 3 June 1858, Daniel married his third wife Sarah Louvell. Nine months later she too died in childbirth together with her twin babies delivered 5 days apart. A Coroner’s Inquest was held which was reported in the newspapers at the time with much emphasis being placed on the delay by Daniel in sending for a doctor and also for not obtaining the medicine prescribed. In one report he is quoted as saying “ D…n the doctors. I won’t have a doctor in the house. They killed my other wives - two before you; and I won’t have one in my house”. [d]
Summing up the Coroner told the Jury that he believed all the evidence that it was necessary to take was now before them, and the case was therefore in their hands. His own opinion of the evidence was that it left no doubt as to the gross display of indifference and heartless brutality on the part of Daniel Tree towards his wife. He was appealed to by the poor creature in her agony to send for medical assistance, and he refused to do so. That was conduct so cruel that he hardly knew how to characterise it. He felt bound thus to express his detestation of the man's behaviour, though at the same time he was aware there was no law which compelled a person to have a medical man in his house against his inclination. Such cases, therefore, it was hard to meet ; but he thanked God that its parallel did not often disgrace the colony.”
And it was reported that: The Jury find that the death of Sarah Tree was caused by puerperal fever, induced by protracted fever and exhaustion. The Jury cannot separate without expressing their abhorrence of the brutal, unnatural, and unfeeling treatment evinced by the husband, Daniel Tree, and of the neglect which it appeared he permitted the deceased to remain in during such an occasion.
From that moment onwards Daniel’s life seems to go downhill.
|Adelaide Observer, April 2 1859|
Remarriage, desertion and imprisonment
When Charlotte died, Daniel was 60 with three young sons aged 6, 4 and 2 so perhaps it’s not surprising he remarried. Eliza Parkinson, became his fourth wife on 4 June 1859 but having lost his livelihood he had fallen on hard times and at the beginning of August he was sentenced to two months imprisonment for deserting his three children, by leaving them at the Destitute Asylum. And in November, Daniel described then as a labourer and former publican, was sentenced to a further two months for deserting his wife. 
|South Australian Register, Sat 6 August 1859|
|South Australian Advertiser, Mon 7 Nov 1859|
The following January he was charged with threatening language and taken into custody.
|South Australian Register, 25 January 1860|
And in September was again imprisoned for deserting his children.
Adelaide Observer 15 Sep 1860
|Adelaide Observer March 30 1861|
In 1861 Daniel applied for free schooling for his children on the basis he was unable to pay but it appears from a later report below that he was unsuccessful.
|South Australian Weekly Chronicle, 25 Oct 1862|
|South Australian Register, 13 May 1863|
In May 1864 the article below in the South Australian Register made specific reference to the Tree children being left in the absence of any educational provision to run the streets of Adelaide whilst their father was in prison for debt.
In October Daniel was imprisoned again for deserting his children by again leaving them at the Destitute Asylum.
|Adelaide Observer 15 Oct 1864|
|South Australian Weekly Chronicle, Oct 22, 1864|
|Adelaide Express, Oct 22 1864
Death of an Old Colonist
|South Australian Advertiser Jan 26 1872|
|South Australian Register, Jan 29 1872|
And as a postscript, even after death, Daniel was still featuring in the local papers….
|South Australian Advertiser, Jan 30:1872|